Entre substance et figurativité. Le discours critique de la poésie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fondé sur trois ouvrages récents consacrés à la poésie contemporaine, l'article fait apparaître une problématique propre à ce discours critique : la présence et le statut d'une dimension figurative en son sein. Au delà d'une simple stratégie persuasive de séduction dont le post-formalisme renouvelle la possibilité, cette pratique du figuratif renvoie à la question de la substance en relation avec la forme. On explicite alors le lien paradoxal qui unit le discours critique à son objet, la poésie contemporaine incorporant dans son exercice une interrogation métalinguistique, et le métalangage critique incorporant quant à lui une dimension figurative du discours pour signifier une proximité sensible avec l'expérience poétique, inaccessible au seul langage conceptuel. Ces parcours inversés inscrivent, dans le discours critique, une poéticité de second degré.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".