MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032145924 · doi:10.1089/gyn.2008.b-02308

Symptomatic Giant Gartner's Duct Cyst of the Vagina

2008· article· en· W2032145924 on OpenAlexaff
Amos A. Akinbiyi, Ian Suchet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gynecologic Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRegina General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesonephric ductMedicineVaginaUreterMullerian DuctsUterusAnatomyDuct (anatomy)SurgeryGynecologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Gartner's duct cysts are remnants of Wolffian ducts, which are usually found in the upper anterolateral part of the vagina. Gartner's cysts are remnants of mesonephric (Wolffian) ducts, which, in women are present in the uterus, vagina, and hymen until the third month of gestation and which give rise to the ureter. Remnants of the Gartner duct may be detected in up to one fourth of adult women, although Gartner's cysts arise only in approximately 1%–2% of the population. Most Gartner's cysts are small (< 3 cm), and they are usually paravaginal and in the anterolateral position; however, they can be large and cause urethral or even ureteric obstruction. Infrequently, giant Gartner's duct cyst has been reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gynecologic SurgerySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207