MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032147664 · doi:10.2118/2004-284

Optimized Natural Gas From Coal Stimulations in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Part I: Database Collection

2004· article· en· W2032147664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T.T. Leshchyshyn

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasCoalSedimentary rockDatabaseStructural basinGeologyNatural (archaeology)Mining engineeringComputer scienceGeochemistryArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeographyEngineeringPaleontologyWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Western Canadian sedimentary basin (WCSB) contains numerous coal seams of various ranks and petrophysical characteristics. The process presented in this paper correlates the area of interest with the rich historic volume of data that is available. Production, detailed stimulation data, engineering designs, petrophysical analysis, fluid analysis and sophisticated computer work come together in the application to produce a statistical approach to initial stimulation designs. The final design evolves with respect to the characteristics of the well of interest. Designing stimulations for coal beds is complicated based on the small amount of unshared and unformatted data that exists in any one place. The significant accomplishment of this paper is rooted in obtaining a large amount of useful data from the many small, incomplete and confusing data sources. Although the data has always existed in various formats and places, the completions or wells rarely reference the target of Natural Gas from Coal (NGC). Cooperation by industry partners enhances the efforts to combine information and improve correlations of well production responses to stimulations. This paper presents the first step in developing a comprehensive design philosophy and database collection to assist is optimizing future NGC wells and plays. Introduction The use of offset treatment data is a valuable tool in the design of fracture stimulation treatments when used properly. However, "just doing what was done before" is not necessarily providing the best design. Offset data is only one aspect of an engineer's repertoire that should also include a thorough knowledge of the reservoir, the client's expectations and goals as well as a solid background of experience. However, designing fracture stimulation treatments for coal seams is a relatively new process. Complicating this learning curve is the shortage of data available to industry due mainly to the tight-hole status of many NGC projects. Everyone wants to benefit from the learning curves of others, but are sure to carefully guard their own experience. However, this state of secrecy is not unwarranted since relatively large tracts of land are waiting to be purchased and developed. Based on the extended times required to show economical production, tighthole status is requested for as long as 5 years to ensure as much secrecy as possible while developing the plays and positioning for future land sales. Through sophisticated data mining techniques, an extensive NGC database can be pieced together using internal and industry data. This data set includes coal reservoir data, completions and production impact results across a wide geographical and geological area encompassing all the major coal plays in the WCSB. The use of this data, while respecting our tight-hole information, is a valuable tool in the design of effective NGC stimulations. Outline of Project Although gas bearing coal bed deposits are pervasive throughout Western Canada, the variation in reservoir quality is significant. To effectively stimulate various coal seams, a thorough understanding of the particular coal is required. Through a detailed analysis of the available data, trends of effective stimulation designs can be developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207