Bibliographic record
Abstract
Étant donné les contraintes budgétaires occasionnant des réformes départementales, il y a lieu de s'interroger sur la meilleure façon de parer aux exigences économiques tout en maintenant l'intégrité intellectuelle des programmes offerts par les départements de langues et de littératures. Prenant à l'appui les efforts de restructuration déployés par le département des Modern Languages and Cultural Studies de l'université de l'Alberta, cet article se penche sur le rôle de médiateur que la traduction est appelée à jouer dans ce genre de situation et propose, à partir d'une réflexion sur la traduction en tant que métaphore, quelques pistes à suivre pour les départements de langues et de littératures en Amérique du Nord. L'intégration des programmes de langue, de linguistique, de traduction et de littérature/culture doit respecter l'altérité de chacun et assurer la compétence culturelle des étudiantes en les préparant intellectuellement pour un monde du travail de plus en plus axé sur l'échange interculturel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".