MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032178672 · doi:10.1159/000122707

Effects of Chronic Stress on Pituitary Hormone Release Induced by Combined Hemi-Extirpation of the Thyroid, Adrenal and Ovary in Rats

2008· article· en· W2032178672 on OpenAlexaff
P. Du Ruisseau, Yvette Taché, Hans Selye, J.R. Ducharme, R. Collu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyProlactinCorticosteroneHormoneThyroidOvaryOvariectomized ratPituitary glandAdrenalectomyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morphologic and hormonal changes, induced by combined ablation of a thyroid lobe, one adrenal and one ovary, were studied over a 15-day period in rats, some of whom were subjected to 8 h of daily immobilization. The compensatory hypertrophy (CH) of the contralateral glands in non-stressed animals was associated with a significant increase in the plasma levels of LH (from the 1st to the 10th day), prolactin (PRL, from the 3rd to the 6th day), FSH (on the 3rd day) and corticosterone (from the 6th to the 15th day), whereas GH titers were not altered. Immobilization for 1, 3, 6, 10 or 15 days inhibited the b.w. gain, induced involution of the thymus, enhanced compensatory enlargement of the adrenal, and blocked the CH of the ovary and, to a lesser degree, of the thyroid. This chronic stressor produced a marked rise in plasma corticosterone, antagonized the surge of PRL, FSH and LH, and decreased the plasma levels of GH. On the basis of these morphological and hormonal variations, it appears that severe chronic stress in hemi-thyroidectomized-adrenalectomized-ovariectomized animals further increases the ACTH response but antagonizes the increased secretion of the other pituitary hormones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207