MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032187158 · doi:10.1017/s0714980815000045

Predictors of Adherence in a Community-Based Tai Chi Program

2015· article· fr· W2032187158 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suhayb Shah, Chris I. Ardern, Hala Tamim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusEthnic groupGerontologyMedicineMental healthPhysical activityDemographyPsychologyPhysical therapyEnvironmental healthPopulationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ Cette étude a examiné les facteurs qui influent l'adhésion dans un programme de de tai-chi à 16 semaines parmi les adultes multi-ethniques d'âge moyen et plus âgés qui vivent dans un environnement faible socio-économique à Toronto. L'analyse a été basée sur des données recueillies auprès de trois cohortes du programme de tai-chi qui ont eu lieu à partir d'août 2009 à mars 2012. La variable principale de résultat, l'adhésion, a été mesurée par le nombre total de sessions suivies par chacun des participants. L'échantillon total était de 210 participants, avec un âge moyen de 68,1 ± 8,6. Basé sur le modèle de régression, l'adhésion a été associée de façon significative à l'âge plus avancé, au stress plus perçu, à l'enseignement supérieur, et aux scores mentales et physiques plus élevés de composants sur le Questionnaire Abrégée 36. Inversement, une faible observance était significativement associée à une activité physique hebdomadaire de base plus élevée. Nos résultats suggèrent que nous devrions cibler les personnes les moins instruites, à la santé mentale et physique médiocre, pour optimiser l'adhésion aux futurs programmes de tai-chi communautaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissementSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207