Le Canada superpuissance énergétique? L'affaire Nexen et la crédibilité de la politique conservatrice envers la Chine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La coopération énergétique sino-canadienne découle d'une dépendance stratégique mutuelle. Pour le gouvernement canadien, assurer les débouchés internationaux et développer la capacité de transport guident l'action gouvernementale et la politique étrangère. C'est dans ce contexte qu'il faut comprendre la priorité accordée à la Chine, malgré d'importantes réticences sur le plan du contrôle d'un État étranger sur ce secteur stratégique. Pour les autorités chinoises, par-delà les discours et les symboles, l'autorisation par les autorités canadienne du rachat de Nexen par la société d’État chinoise China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC) représente à la fois un test de crédibilité de la nouvelle politique conservatrice et l'expression concrète du nouveau partenariat stratégique Chine-Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".