Relations et perceptions entre un peuple et son clergé à la fin du xixe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’époque étudiée couvre en gros les années 1890–1900. Cette période a été choisie parce qu’elle correspond à l’arrivée de la congrégation des eudistes à la baie Sainte-Marie en Nouvelle-Écosse. Ce qu’il nous a semblé intéressant d’analyser ici, ce sont les premières années de la rencontre entre ces pères venus de France et la communauté acadienne qui vivait dans le sud-ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse depuis environ un siècle. L’objectif est donc d’étudier différents types de sources disponibles sur l’époque, soit la correspondance des eudistes, le journal L’Évangéline et la tradition orale, et ce afin de mieux comprendre les zones d’échanges culturels mais aussi de résistance entre les pères et les Acadiens. Les trois pistes qui ont été retenues — pratiques religieuses, perceptions mutuelles et croyances superstitieuses — permettent de montrer la variété des situations en fonction des documents utilisés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".