Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Pulmonary Function in Saskatchewan Grain Handlers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the contribution of lifestyle (cigarettes) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha polymorphisms at position 308 of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene promotor (TNF-308*1/*2) to pulmonary function among grain handlers. METHODS: Employed male grain handlers (157) provided occupational and respiratory symptom information, pulmonary function measurements, and DNA for genotyping. RESULTS: The genotypes of 101 were TNF-308*1/*1, 47 were *1/*2, and nine were *2/*2. Current smokers whose genotype was *2/*2 or *1/*2 had lower values compared with other combinations of genotype and smoking status. Among *1/*1 homozygotes, current smokers had better percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = 0.04) mean values than nonsmokers and better percent of predicted forced vital capacity than exsmokers (P = 0.017) or nonsmokers (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the complexity of determining which workers will develop acute and chronic adverse pulmonary conditions in response to exposure to grain dust and the toxins in cigarette smoke interacting with their genotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".