MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032309136 · doi:10.1177/0363546512456974

The Evaluation of Arthroscopic Remplissage by High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2012· article· en· W2032309136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Min Jung Park, Grant H. Garcia, Amit D. Malhotra, Nancy M. Major, Fotios P. Tjoumakaris, John D. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineRadiologyNuclear magnetic resonancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic remplissage is a novel procedure recently advocated for the treatment of large Hill-Sachs lesions with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. We have shown previously that infraspinatus tenodesis and Bankart repair reduce the risk of recurrent instability in high-risk patients. The ability to perform this procedure arthroscopically and without the need for bone grafting or an open approach makes this an appealing alternative to more traditional techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate and characterize the postoperative appearance of the remplissage procedure on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate these findings to clinical outcome (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score, range of motion). STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: In patients who had undergone arthroscopic remplissage for recurrent glenohumeral instability with large Hill-Sachs defects, images were acquired with a 3-T protocol (and reviewed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists) with the shoulder in the abduction-external rotation (ABER) and neutral positions at the time of the latest clinical examination. Measured parameters included signal intensity of tissue within the prior defect, signal intensity of the residual infraspinatus, degree of fatty infiltrate and muscle atrophy as a percentage of fat signal versus muscle signal (Goutallier grade), presence of marrow edema, and number of anchors in the defect. Functional scores were obtained with the WOSI questionnaire, and comprehensive range of motion data were recorded with a goniometer. RESULTS: In 11 patients with an average clinical follow-up of 18.0 months (range, 8.8-27.2 months), the average size of the Hill-Sachs deformity was 334.3 mm(3) (range, 93.6-825.1 mm(3)). The percentage of the deformity filled in with tendon was 75% to 100%, and the degree of atrophy was 0% to 25% for all patients studied. No defects were left unfilled. Two patients had granulation tissue filling the lesion, and 3 patients had fibrous tissue, while the rest of the patients had the MRI appearance of both granulation and fibrous tissue. Four of 9 patients had tendinopathy or partial tears of the residual infraspinatus tendon insertion, and 1 patient demonstrated residual bone marrow edema. The average number of anchors used was 1.4 (range, 1-3). The average WOSI score was 74.3% (range, 41.6%-99.2%), with an average external rotation loss of 5.8° (range, 0°-22°). One patient had recurrence of instability. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that there is evidence of tendon incorporation and fill into the Hill-Sachs defect following arthroscopic remplissage at 8 months and beyond. Although MRI findings did not correlate with the clinical findings, patients were satisfied with the procedure and demonstrated minimal loss of external rotation (average, 5.8°) at early follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207