Older Children and Adolescents Surviving With Vertically Acquired HIV Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the characteristics of children infected vertically with HIV surviving 10 years or more who were enrolled in the prospective European Collaborative Study. Thirty-four of 187 infected children were identified with a median age of 11.4 years (range, 10.1-15.9 years). Factors examined included clinical status, immunologic and virologic characteristics, type of antiretroviral therapy, and psychosocial characteristics. By 10 years of age, 6 (18%) children had progressed to Class A as determined by the system of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 17 (52%) to class B, 7 (21%) to class C, and 3 (9%) had remained asymptomatic. At 73% (904 of 1234) of scheduled clinic visits, these children had no symptoms of HIV disease. Most children were in CDC immune categories 1 (18, 56%) or 2 (11, 34%) at their last visit. Three quarters (24 patients) were on combination therapy with three or more drugs, although 3 children had never received any antiretroviral therapy. Nineteen (56%) children were living with at least 1 parent and the mothers of 13 (38%) children had died. Most (77%) children had been told about their HIV infection. Children infected vertically with HIV who have survived their first 10 years are mainly free of serious symptoms. As they enter adolescence, additional services are needed including support with disclosure to others, therapy, and sexual health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".