MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032322665 · doi:10.1139/e03-029

Le bassin de Tizi n'Test (Haut Atlas, Maroc) : exemple d'évolution d'un segment oblique au rift de l'Atlantique central au Trias

2003· article· en· W2032322665 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelmounim Qarbous, Fida Medina, Christian Hoepffner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGrabenRiftHalf-grabenStructural basinExtensional definitionSeismologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed mapping completed by a microtectonic study of the Tizi n'Test Triassic basin, located along the Tizi n'Test fault zone in the Moroccan High Atlas, has allowed us to improve the knowledge on the geometry of the structures and the activity of faults during the Triassic extensional events related to the rifting of the central Atlantic. The latter are reflected by the development of a rift, at present inverted and deformed by the collision of Africa and Europe, comprising kilometric-scale grabens and half-grabens bounded by major faults trending ENE–WSW, with a dip towards the NNW, and a dip-slip syndepositional motion. Inverse analysis of fault slickenside populations shows a heterogeneous Triassic state of stress. However, in the most significant measurement sites, the maximum horizontal stress σ1 is vertical, while the minimum stress σ3 is horizontal with a NW–SE trend. The strike-slip component appears to be very small during the Triassic, a noticeable fact because of the obliquity of the basin with respect to the Atlantic rift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207