MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032381751 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2010.2054113

Application of Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System for Sensorless Control of PMSG-Based Wind Turbine With Nonlinear-Load-Compensation Capabilities

2010· article· en· W2032381751 on OpenAlexaff
Mukhtiar Singh, Ambrish Chandra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemPermanent magnet synchronous generatorRotor (electric)InductanceEngineeringComputer scienceFuzzy control systemControl engineeringFuzzy logicVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The precise information of permanent-magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) rotor position and speed is essentially required to operate it on maximum power points. This paper presents an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for speed and position estimation of PMSG, where an ANFIS-based model reference adaptive system is continuously tuned with actual PMSG to neutralize the effect of parameter variations such as stator resistance, inductance, and torque constant. This ANFIS-tuned estimator is able to estimate the rotor position and speed accurately over a wide speed range with a great immunity against parameter variation. The proposed system consists of two back-to-back connected inverters, where one controls the PMSG, while another is used for grid synchronization. Moreover, in the proposed study, the grid-side inverter is also utilized as harmonic, reactive power, and unbalanced load compensator for a three-phase, four-wire (3P4W) nonlinear load, if any, at point of common coupling (PCC). This enables the grid to always supply/absorb a balanced set of fundamental currents at unity power factor. The proposed system is developed and simulated using MATLAB/SimPowerSystem (SPS) toolbox. Besides this, a scaled laboratory hardware prototype is developed and extensive experimental study is carried out to validate the proposed control approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations189
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207