Pauvreté urbaine et exclusion sociale. Les nouvelles figures du travail social auprès des personnes et des communautés locales en difficulté
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent texte aborde trois questions: la première a trait à l'insuffisance des différentes analyses de la pauvreté et à sa relecture par l'introduction de la notion d'exclusion sociale. La seconde renvoie à l'émergence d'un double renouvellement des pratiques: le renouvellement de l'intervention psychosociale par une approche de prévention sociale et de promotion de réseaux et le renouvellement de l'intervention communautaire par une approche de développement local. Enfin, nous avançons la proposition suivante : depuis bientôt dix ans, l'émergence de corporations de développement communautaire (CDC) et de corporations de développement économique communautaire (CDEC) illustre ce double renouvellement des pratiques entant que nouveaux dispositifs d'accompagnement dans l'empowerment des personnes et des communautés locales en difficulté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".