MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032443226 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.166

Qualité et enseignement supérieur au Brésil

2010· article· fr· W2032443226 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marialva Moog Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Amérique latine, dans le cadre des réflexions sur l’enseignement supérieur, nous entendons souvent les expressions « pour un enseignement de qualité » ou « une institution d’enseignement par excellence ». Ces expressions semblent renfermer un grand nombre de catégories, d’intentions, de désirs, de croyances qui se passent d’explication. L’expression « éducation de qualité »semble ne pas exiger de complément, puisque les termes qualité et excellence indiquent le maximum, le meilleur. Une ex...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicEducation and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207