Use of passive-microwave data to monitor spatial and temporal variations of snow cover at tree line near Churchill, Manitoba, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We evaluated the contribution of Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) passive-microwave data to the monitoring of spatial and temporal variability of snow cover in the Churchill area, Manitoba, Canada. Because of the coarse spatial resolution of current passive-microwave sensors, the estimation of snow water equivalent using empirical equations with these instruments is largely compromised in complex areas such as Churchill (forest–tundra ecotone). However, with its high frequency of observations and the availability of a long time series (1988–99), passive-microwave data from the SSM/I radiometer remain a very valuable tool for monitoring the temporal evolution of snow cover at various spatial scales. Through winter 1997/98, we first examined the passive-microwave signatures at the local scale and we identified the major stages of the snow period. Principal-component analysis (PCA) applied on spectral-difference (Tb(19H) - Tb(37H))time series (1988–99) enabled us to identify spatio-temporal effects over a large area. PCA also permitted the extraction of indices of relevance for monitoring climatic variability and climate change (annual snow-cover duration, dates of snow-cover appearance and disappearance).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".