Assessment of Cutaneous Photosensitivity of TOOKAD (WST09) in Preclinical Animal Models and in Patients¶
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TOOKAD (WST09) is a new, long-wavelength palladium bacteriopheophorbide photosensitizer that targets tissue vasculature. The cutaneous phototoxicity of TOOKAD was assessed in normal rat and pig animal models and in patients in a Phase-I trial of TOOKAD-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) for recurrent prostate cancer. Controlled skin exposures were administered using solar-simulated light at various times after drug administration. Two different spectral ranges were used. In the first, the UV portion of the spectrum was removed (UV(-)) because UV irradiation in nondrugged control animals produced an erythema response at incident energy densities (J/cm(2)) lower than those required to induce a PDT response. In the second, the full solar spectrum (UV(+)) was used, and the potentiation by the photosensitizer of the UV-mediated minimum erythema dose was assessed. Results showed that the PDT skin response was negligible at clinical drug doses of 2 mg/kg for any period after administration at light doses of 128 J/cm(2) in the animal models. In patients, there was no observed UV(-) skin response at doses of up to 2 mg/kg, drug-light intervals of 1-3 h or greater and light exposures up to 128 J/cm(2). At higher drug doses in the rat and pig models, the duration of skin phototoxicity was found to be approximately 3 h and less than 1 h, respectively. Using the full spectrum of solar-simulated light, the presence of TOOKAD did not measurably enhance the UV(+)-induced erythema in the rats, pigs or patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".