Antibody Response Specific to the Capsular Polysaccharide Is Impaired in Streptococcus suis Serotype 2-Infected Animals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Streptococcus suis serotype 2 is an extracellular encapsulated bacterium that causes severe septicemia and meningitis in swine and humans. Albeit crucial in the fight against encapsulated bacteria, the nature of the capsular polysaccharide (CPS)-specific antibody (Ab) response during S. suis type 2 infection is unknown. We compared for the first time the features of CPS-specific versus protein-specific Ab responses during experimental infections with live virulent S. suis type 2 in mice. The primary protein-specific Ab response was dominated by both type 1 and 2 IgG subclasses, whereas IgM titers were more modest. The secondary protein-specific Ab response showed all of the features of a memory response with faster kinetics and boosted the titers of all Ig isotypes. In contrast, the primary CPS-specific Ab response was either inexistent or had titers only slightly higher than those in noninfected animals and was essentially composed of IgM. A poor CPS-specific memory response was observed, with only a moderate boost in IgM titers and no IgG. Both protein- and CPS-specific Ab responses were Toll-like receptor 2 independent. By using S. suis type 2 strains of European or North American origin, the poor CPS-specific Ab response was demonstrated to be independent of the genotypic/phenotypic diversity of the strain within serotype 2. Finally, the CPS-specific Ab response was also impaired and lacked isotype switching in S. suis-infected pigs, the natural host of the bacterium. The better resistance of preinfected animals to reinfection with the same strain of S. suis type 2 might thus more likely be related to the development of a protein rather than CPS Ab response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".