MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032487020 · doi:10.3138/md.46.2.151

Stages of Emergency: The Casualties Union

2003· article· en· W2032487020 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tracy C. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeacetimeRubbleEngineeringForensic engineeringEmergency reliefDemolitionLawHistoryPolitical scienceCivil engineeringEmergency management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the spring of 1941, during the latter days of the London Blitz, St. Andrew’s Convent School in Leatherhead, seventeen miles southwest of Charing Cross, was badly damaged by a parachute mine. The nuns evacuated, turning the ruined building over to the county. The mine exploded in the bend of the elbow-shaped building, leaving “a mixture of totally destroyed, unstable but shorable and secure ruins”. In these ruins, Surrey established a Rescue School, where civil defence workers went to practise techniques for safely extricating victims from bombed-out structures. Squads came down from London and surrounding regions to become proficient in handling ropes and tackle, shoring up dodgy debris to allow workers access and victims egress, and extricating stretcher cases from precarious positions. The school’s superintendent, an engineer who in peacetime inspected the county’s bridges, routinely laid down in the rubble and observed students’ proficiency as they extricated him from beneath collapsed walls and out of cellar basements. Eric Claxton later admitted, “I pretended a nonchalance I did not always possess that their knots were properly formed when they hoisted me out from a third storey window opening! It made them more careful and gave them confidence to feel that I had faith in them”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207