Field Testing of in Cross-Country Skiers With Portable Breath-by-Breath System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peak aerobic exercise responses were determined in 8 competitive cross-country skiers during field-testing and during an incremental treadmill test (TM) to determine peak oxygen uptake (VáO2peak), heart rate, and oxygen pulse. Field testing consisted of maximal effort roller skiing using diagonal stride (DS) and double poling (DP) techniques. VáO2 was measured during roller skiing by the portable Cosmed K4b2 breath-by-breath system. The portable system was compared against a standard laboratory mixing box system, and no differences were found across the full range of VáO2. During DS, VáO2peak and oxygen pulse were not different from TM, whereas peak HR was lower. With DP, VáO2peak and oxygen pulse were less than DS or TM, whereas peak HR was less than with TM but not different from DS. These results demonstrate the validity and utility of the portable breath-by-breath system for measurement of aerobic energy demand of athletes as they carry out their normal activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".