MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032501869 · doi:10.1117/12.448225

<title>Minimization of edge effects in images using an extrapolated discrete wavelet transform</title>

2001· article· en· W2032501869 on OpenAlexaff
Sumit K. Nath, Éric Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformBiorthogonal systemExtrapolationWaveletWavelet transformComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMinificationAlgorithmSecond-generation wavelet transformImage processingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionImage (mathematics)Computer visionLifting schemeMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discrete wavelet transform(DWT) is a tool extensively used in image processing algorithms. It can be used to decorrelate information from the original image, which can thus help in compressing the data for storage, transmission or other post-processing purposes. However, the finite nature of such images gives rise to edge artifacts in the reconstructed data. A commonly used technique to overcome this problem is a symmetric extension of the image, which can preserve zeroth order continuity in the data. This still produces undesirable edge artifacts in derivatives and subsampled versions of the image. In this paper we present an extension to Williams and Amaratunga's work of extrapolating the image data using a polynomial extrapolation technique before performing the forward or inverse DWT for biorthogonal wavelets. Comaparitive results of reconstructed data, with individual subband reconstruction as well as using the embedded zerotree coding (EZC) scheme, are also presented for both the aforementioned techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207