Rheological Properties and Microstructure of Hypereutectic Semi-Solid Al-Si-Mg Alloys Using Rheocasting Route
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The SEED rheocasting process was used to produce semi-solid slurries of hypereutectic Al-17Si-4.5Cu (A390) and Al-15Si-10.5Mg-4Cu alloys respectively. The rheological properties of these alloys in the semi-solid state were characterized at different deformation rates and at variable solid fractions using the parallel plate compression viscometry. The viscosity at different shear rates was calculated using a Newtonian fluid model for increments of deformation during compression. Microstructures of both alloys, after partial solidification and compression, were examined in order to characterize the flow behavior during deformation. The comparison of the viscosity between the A390 and Al-15Si-10.5Mg-4Cu alloys indicated that the high Mg containing alloy possessed a higher viscosity for the range of shear rates and solid fractions investigated. Rheological results showed that at a given solid fraction, the viscosity of both alloys decreased significantly with increasing shear rates, indicating a shear thinning behavior. In addition, a separation of liquid and solid phases was also observed for both alloys in the microstructural study of compressed semi-solid billets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it