Seismic triggering of catastrophic failures on shear surfaces in saturated cohesionless soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with an analysis of the seismic performance of infinite slopes in undrained conditions. The material assumed on the sliding surface is a loose saturated sand susceptible to a gradual loss in undrained shear strength after failure with the progress of unidirectional shear displacement. The undrained monotonic and cyclic shear behavior of this sand was investigated through an experimental study based on ring shear tests, with initial stresses corresponding to the static conditions on the sliding surface of the analyzed slopes. These tests provide the experimental framework for a modified sliding block method to estimate the earthquake-induced undrained shear displacements for conditions of no shear stress reversals on the sliding surface. The proposed estimation procedure incorporates the shearing resistance obtained from undrained monotonic ring shear tests to approximate the undrained yield resistance at a certain displacement during an earthquake. The term catastrophic failure is used in this study to define the accelerated motion of a potential sliding soil mass due to the static driving shear stress exceeding the reduced undrained yield resistance of the soil on the shear surface. The critical displacement necessary to trigger a catastrophic failure on the shear surface under seismic conditions was derived based on the shear resistance shear displacement curve obtained under monotonic loading conditions. Using the shear resistance shear displacement data from undrained monotonic ring shear tests and several processed horizontal earthquake accelerograms, the minimum peak earthquake acceleration necessary to cause a catastrophic shear failure under various seismic waveforms was estimated for conditions of no shear stress reversals on the sliding surface.Key words: earthquakes, slopes, critical shear displacement, sand, ring shear tests, undrained shear strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".