Some Effects of Particle Wettability in Agitated Solid‐Gas‐Liquid Systems: Gas‐Liquid Mass Transfer and the Dispersion of Floating Solids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two‐ and three‐phase systems have been studied using particles that are water‐wetted and denser than water and with similar sized, small floating particles, both wetted and non‐wetted. The parameters investigated have been the agitator speed required to disperse the different types of particles under sparged and non‐sparged conditions and rates of gas‐liquid mass transfer. With the wetted, dense particles, only at concentrations of > ∼20% w/w did the kLa fall significantly (by ∼20 to 30%) whilst solid suspension followed the trends of earlier work. With the less dense particles, even with < ∼1% w/w that were not wetted, it was very difficult to disperse them throughout the liquid phase, though up‐pumping impellers were more effective than radial. In addition, bubble size significantly increased and kLa fell by a factor of 2 to 3. With the wetted, less dense ones up to 2% w/w, uniform dispersion was achieved even at much lower speeds and kLa did not change compared to the case without solids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".