MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032548640 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0025

English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey (review)

2007· article· en· W2032548640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiographical and Historical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyWatsonAsideHistoryFormative assessmentPeriod (music)ClassicsLiteratureArt historyArtSociologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey Martine Watson Brownley (bio) Allan Pritchard. English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey University of Toronto Press. viii, 298. $60.00 For the past decade or two, few critical treatments of biographical writing have failed to include remarks decrying the lack of contemporary attention to the genre by literary scholars, even as such analyses have continued to appear regularly. Occasionally, when versions of this critical canard are carefully qualified, the observations actually turn out to be valid, as they are in the case of Allan Pritchard's claims in his study of seventeenth-century English biography. Pritchard is correct that this formative area has long been neglected because of the tendency to focus on the eighteenth-century achievements of James Boswell, Samuel Johnson, and others. Aside from some treatments of individual seventeenth-century biographers, Donald Stauffer's English Biography before 1700, published in 1930, has by default remained the major overview, and Pritchard's study is a welcome addition to fill this scholarly gap. The case for the formative role of the seventeenth century in the development of English biography emphasizes the impressive growth in biographical output over the period: 'A complete list of sixteenth-century English biographies would be short, but a complete list of seventeenth-century biographies would be so long that no one has yet ventured to compile such a bibliography.' Along with this numerical increase, the range of figures deemed worthy of biographical treatment expanded significantly – no longer were kings and saints the major candidates – and new formal options emerged. Pritchard's eleven chapters focus on the major inherited traditions (religious biography, the numerically dominant form throughout the period, and the lives of political and military leaders); on the newer types of biography that appeared, particularly in the second half of the century (the lives of intellectual and literary figures and brief lives); and on the major writers in both the older exemplary traditions (Izaak Walton) and the emerging more realistic modes (John Aubrey and Roger North). The terrain of biography, seemingly one of the most accessible and open of genres, actually offers a number of potential critical snares, most of which Pritchard avoids. The radical differences between early English biography and our own biographical expectations and practices make teleology a constant temptation. Pritchard's refreshing honesty about the difficulties confronting modern readers of seventeenth-century biographies – the abstraction and the focal problems of the texts, for example – means that critical judgments are seldom skewed in terms of future developments. Moreover, unlike its currently more glamorous sibling autobiography, which tends to dominate wherever it is textually grafted, biography has historically functioned as a host rather than a parasite among genres. As a result, it can sometimes be difficult, particularly with early biography, to separate it from the historical, devotional, polemical, and even satirical [End Page 412] writings in which it is often embedded. In such cases Pritchard consistently avoids over-readings of the kind which have marred previous treatments. Books like this one are not flashy; they lack the theoretical or critical pyrotechnics necessary for 'shock and awe.' This study offers the comprehensiveness, the illumination of larger generic and subgeneric patterns, and the judicious deployment of detail that mark the best examples of its own genre, the critical survey. Critics often complain that biography lacks a poetics. If one is ever to be developed, it will come after, and depend on, thorough and careful studies like this one. Pritchard has provided a solid scholarly grounding for future studies of early English biography. In addition, at a time when too many publishers are turning out books that look like candidates for the recycling bin before they have even reached their first readers, the University of Toronto Press deserves everyone's gratitude for continuing to produce books of the highest quality that are a pleasure to read. Martine Watson Brownley Martine Watson Brownley, Department of English, Emory University Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it