MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2032548640 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0025

English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey (review)

2007· article· en· W2032548640 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueBiographical and Historical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyWatsonAsideHistoryFormative assessmentPeriod (music)ClassicsLiteratureArt historyArtSociologyAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey Martine Watson Brownley (bio) Allan Pritchard. English Biography in the Seventeenth Century: A Critical Survey University of Toronto Press. viii, 298. $60.00 For the past decade or two, few critical treatments of biographical writing have failed to include remarks decrying the lack of contemporary attention to the genre by literary scholars, even as such analyses have continued to appear regularly. Occasionally, when versions of this critical canard are carefully qualified, the observations actually turn out to be valid, as they are in the case of Allan Pritchard's claims in his study of seventeenth-century English biography. Pritchard is correct that this formative area has long been neglected because of the tendency to focus on the eighteenth-century achievements of James Boswell, Samuel Johnson, and others. Aside from some treatments of individual seventeenth-century biographers, Donald Stauffer's English Biography before 1700, published in 1930, has by default remained the major overview, and Pritchard's study is a welcome addition to fill this scholarly gap. The case for the formative role of the seventeenth century in the development of English biography emphasizes the impressive growth in biographical output over the period: 'A complete list of sixteenth-century English biographies would be short, but a complete list of seventeenth-century biographies would be so long that no one has yet ventured to compile such a bibliography.' Along with this numerical increase, the range of figures deemed worthy of biographical treatment expanded significantly – no longer were kings and saints the major candidates – and new formal options emerged. Pritchard's eleven chapters focus on the major inherited traditions (religious biography, the numerically dominant form throughout the period, and the lives of political and military leaders); on the newer types of biography that appeared, particularly in the second half of the century (the lives of intellectual and literary figures and brief lives); and on the major writers in both the older exemplary traditions (Izaak Walton) and the emerging more realistic modes (John Aubrey and Roger North). The terrain of biography, seemingly one of the most accessible and open of genres, actually offers a number of potential critical snares, most of which Pritchard avoids. The radical differences between early English biography and our own biographical expectations and practices make teleology a constant temptation. Pritchard's refreshing honesty about the difficulties confronting modern readers of seventeenth-century biographies – the abstraction and the focal problems of the texts, for example – means that critical judgments are seldom skewed in terms of future developments. Moreover, unlike its currently more glamorous sibling autobiography, which tends to dominate wherever it is textually grafted, biography has historically functioned as a host rather than a parasite among genres. As a result, it can sometimes be difficult, particularly with early biography, to separate it from the historical, devotional, polemical, and even satirical [End Page 412] writings in which it is often embedded. In such cases Pritchard consistently avoids over-readings of the kind which have marred previous treatments. Books like this one are not flashy; they lack the theoretical or critical pyrotechnics necessary for 'shock and awe.' This study offers the comprehensiveness, the illumination of larger generic and subgeneric patterns, and the judicious deployment of detail that mark the best examples of its own genre, the critical survey. Critics often complain that biography lacks a poetics. If one is ever to be developed, it will come after, and depend on, thorough and careful studies like this one. Pritchard has provided a solid scholarly grounding for future studies of early English biography. In addition, at a time when too many publishers are turning out books that look like candidates for the recycling bin before they have even reached their first readers, the University of Toronto Press deserves everyone's gratitude for continuing to produce books of the highest quality that are a pleasure to read. Martine Watson Brownley Martine Watson Brownley, Department of English, Emory University Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,875
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle