Imido Analogues of Common Oxo Anions: A New Episode in the Chemistry of Cluster Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxo anions of p- and d-block elements, for example, SiO(4)(4-), PO(4)(3-), SO(4)(2-), and CrO(4)(2-), are commonly encountered species. The full or partial replacement of the oxo ligands by isoelectronic imido (NR) groups generates homoleptic polyimido anions of the type [E(NR)(x)](z-) or heteroleptic imidooxo anions with the general formula [O(y)E(NR)(x-y)](z-) (where E=main group element or transition metal). The alkali metal derivatives of this new class of anions form ternary or quaternary cluster systems, respectively. The structures of these clusters can be rationalized in terms of the self-assembly of fundamental building blocks. An understanding of the factors that control this process may allow the design of functional materials with specific properties. In addition, these anions are attracting attention as multidentate ligands with unique electronic and stereochemical properties that may engender novel metal-centered chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".