Stomach Contents of Snow Crab (<i>Chionoecetes opilio</i>, Decapoda, Brachyura) from the Northeast Newfoundland Shelf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A sample of about 1000 snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) from NAFO (Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization) Division 3K (Northeast Newfoundland Shelf), taken by bottom trawl for studies of their stomach contents, indicated that about 12 benthic or demersal prey types occurred in their diet from that area. The most frequently occurring prey types were sabellid polychaetes, crustaceans (shrimp, crabs and smaller crustaceans) and infaunal clams (Macoma calcarea). Shrimps (especially pink shrimp, Pandalus borealis) and fishes (especially capelin, Mallotus villosus) were the most important prey types with respect to their percentage contribution to the total food mass. Brittle stars (Ophiuroidea) were regularly preyed upon by males but were virtually absent from the stomach contents of mature females. Males preyed more heavily upon fish and infaunal prey types (polychaetes and clams) whereas females preyed more heavily on shrimp and readily-accessible epibenthic prey types (gastropods, crabs and sea urchins). Males appeared to be more capable predators than were mature females. Predation on fish was related to predator size for both sexes but was most commonly practiced by males that were larger than the maximum size of mature females. However predation on fish was also more commonly practiced by males than by mature females at comparable sizes. There were no other effects of predator size in the predation by males whereas predation by mature females on clams, shrimp, gastropods, sea urchins, and possibly polychaetes increased with predator size. Cannibalism was most frequently practiced by intermediate-sized crabs and more frequently by females than males. Cannibalism was more common in our study than in others reported to date and may represent an important densitydependent source of mortality that could affect recruitment levels and patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".