MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unique features of the basal cells of human prostate epithelium

2000· article· en· W2032588123 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Elalfy, G. Pelletier, Louis Hermo, Fernand Labrie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitheliumBasal (medicine)Basement membraneMyoepithelial cellStromaBiologyProstatePathologyHyperplasiaStromal cellCell biologyEndocrinologyMedicineImmunologyCancer researchImmunohistochemistryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prostate gland is globally composed of epithelium and stroma. The epithelium plays an important role in the development of both benign and malignant disorders while the stroma is involved in benign prostatic hyperplasia. While the prostatic epithelium of the majority of laboratory animals is well recognized as a pseudostratified columnar, the classification of the human prostatic epithelium is controversial. Moreover, the role of the basal cells of the human prostatic epithelium is still uncertain. These cells have been described as undifferentiated cells, precursors of luminal cells, reserve and myoepithelial cells. The objective of the present study was to assess the similarities and/or differences between the epithelium of the human prostate and that of other laboratory animals and thus derive information about the potential functions of basal cells in the human prostate. In the human, basal cells form a continuous layer of cells resting on the basement membrane and upon which rests a layer of luminal cells. This results in a stratified columnar epithelium of two layers of cells, unlike the sporadic appearance of basal cells observed in other species where it results in a pseudostratified epithelium. In addition, the ratio of basal to luminal cells in the human is about 1:1, while the average ratio in the other animal species examined is about 1:7. Furthermore, the gap junctional proteins connexin 26 and 43, are present between basal and luminal cells in the human, thus suggesting that these cells communicate directly with each other. In addition, the ultrastructure of the human basal cells shows morphological evidence of differentiated but not of undifferentiated cells. Moreover, the presence of junction-like structures between adjacent basal cells suggests that these cells form a blood-prostate barrier. In this way, basal cells could prevent substances derived from the blood from directly coming in contact with the luminal cells. Human basal cells could thus regulate functions of the luminal cells by being part of a two-cell mechanism somewhat analogous to thecal and granulosa cells in the ovary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it