MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032605394 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-140

Abstract 140: XIAP expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells is a key determinant of threshold to TRAIL-induced apoptotic cell death

2010· article· en· W2032605394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jianhui Yang, Yili Xie, Erika Witasp, King F. Kwong

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXIAPApoptosisCancer researchTransfectionProgrammed cell deathclone (Java method)Molecular biologyInhibitor of apoptosisCell cultureBiologyWestern blotLung cancerCellChemistryCaspaseMedicineOncologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Intrinsic resistance to apoptosis-induction by TRAIL is found in the majority of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Previously, we have shown that intrinsic TRAIL-resistance in NSCLC cells can be markedly attenuated by transient transfection of siRNA directed against XIAP, and accordingly rendering TRAIL-resistant NSCLC cells restored TRAIL-sensitivity, with markedly enhanced apoptosis rates. The objective of the current study is to investigate the effects of XIAP overexpression in intrinsically TRAIL-sensitive lung cancer cells with respect to its threshold to apoptotic cell death. Methods: Lentiviral p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD) were transduced in cultured human NSCLC H460 cells to generate stable clones. Subsequently, p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP-H460 cell colonies were screened for optimal vector expression and XIAP overexpression and then propagated in culture for further analysis. Parental H460 and negative control H460-p-empty stable clone cells were used for comparisons. p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP-H460 stable clones, negative control H460-p-empty stable clones, and H460 parental cells were cultured with and without administration of TRAIL. Also, XIAP overexpression stable clones were treated with TRAIL alone, Smac mimetic AEG40730 (Vibrant Pharma, Inc., Ontario, CN), or their combination. Cellular proliferation was measured using MTT assays. Caspase activation was evaluated using Western blot analysis and caspase activity was quantified by fluorescence caspase assays. Results: p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP-H460 stable clone cells exhibited a significant increase in protection against TRAIL-induced cell death compared to TRAIL-sensitive parental H460 and H460-p-empty cells across a spectrum of TRAIL concentrations. Also, marked reductions in caspase activation, as a result of decreased sensitivity to TRAIL, were found in p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP-H460 cells despite TRAIL administration. Rescue treatment of p-Receiver-lv19-XIAP-H460 stable clones with combination Smac mimetic AEG40730 and TRAIL was able to negate the effects of XIAP overexpression and restore intrinsic sensitivity to TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity. Conclusions: TRAIL resistance can be conferred to intrinsically TRAIL-sensitive lung cancer cells via XIAP overexpression alone. The increased threshold to apoptotic cell death is mediated via XIAP's inhibitory effects on the canonical apoptosis pathways. However, TRAIL-sensitivity can be rescued in XIAP overexpressing lung cancer cells by combination treatment with anti-XIAP Smac mimetic and TRAIL administration. These results, along with previous work, demonstrate that XIAP is a key determinant of apoptotic cell death in lung cancer cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 140.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207