MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032624552 · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.046306

Breather generation in fully nonlinear models of a stratified fluid

2007· article· en· W2032624552 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin G. Lamb, O. E. Polukhina, Tatiana Talipova, Efim Pelinovsky, Wenting Xiao, Andrey Kurkin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreatherKorteweg–de Vries equationNonlinear systemIntegrable systemEuler equationsMathematicsMathematical analysisStratified flowsStratified flowEuler's formulaSolitonAmplitudeClassical mechanicsPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear wave motion is studied in a symmetric, continuously stratified, smoothed three-layer fluid in the framework of the fully nonlinear Euler equations under the Boussinesq approximation. The weakly nonlinear limit is discussed in which the governing equations can be reduced to the fully integrable modified Korteweg-de Vries equation. For some choices of the layer thicknesses the cubic nonlinear term is positive and the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation has soliton and breather solutions. Using such a stratification, the Euler equations are solved numerically using a sign-variable, initial disturbance. Breathers were generated for several forms of the initial disturbance. The breathers have moderate amplitude and to a good approximation can be described by the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation. As far as we know this is the first presentation of a breather in numerical simulations using the full nonlinear Euler equations for a stratified fluid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207