MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

September 11th—A Memoir

2001· article· en· W2032627914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alden N. Haffner

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Conflict Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingStatueMemoirSymbol (formal)World trade centerQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)LawPaintingYardPoliticsArt historySkylineHistoryArtTerrorismPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following his very serious illness a quarter of a century ago at an Academy meeting in New York, Irv Borish was hospitalized and I helped to care for him and his beloved Bea until they could return home to Indiana. Though I adamantly refused to accept any gift of appreciation, Irv, an accomplished artist, insisted that he prepare a painting for my home. He drew a magnificent rendition of the New York City skyline highlighted by the twin towers of the now destroyed World Trade Center. The day after the tragic and horrific attack upon New York City (and upon the Pentagon), I viewed the painting again, but this time more contemplatively. The towers were a symbol of economic strength that proudly stood several hundred yards across the bay from the Statue of Liberty, our country’s great symbol of political freedom. But oppressors and aggressors and, yes, terrorists, too, have learned that nothing rouses this country more resolutely that an attack upon our precepts of state, of freedom, and of our way of life. The lesson will again be learned by those who did not understand us. The World Trade Center and its environs, now the cruel cemetery for more than 5000 innocent victims, will without question be rebuilt, probably in a different structural configuration and with a permanent memorial for those who died. But it will, also, be a monument to our cherished freedoms that the terrorists so mendaciously tried and failed to destroy. In the general assembly held at the noon hour on Thursday, September 13th, the day all of our SUNY classes resumed their schedules, I addressed the entire student body, as well as the faculty and staff. But most of all, my remarks were for our future colleagues, our students. I told them that I was raised as a child to believe that the most powerful antidote to those who would do bad deeds was for people to do well. What a wonderful calling in life is optometry that each day we minister to our patients by doing good things for them, to help to better their lives, and to prevent and alleviate disability. How fortunate they were to have chosen optometry as their career path. They were destined to do good things for people, the most powerful weapon against those who would perpetrate evil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.594
Teacher spread0.521 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicHealth and Conflict StudiesFrench-language works237,207