MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032635644 · doi:10.1115/1.4007553

Parameter-Dependent ℋ∞ Filtering for Linear Time-Varying Systems

2012· article· en· W2032635644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolytopeLyapunov functionFilter (signal processing)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Filter designStability theoryApplied mathematicsLinear systemNorm (philosophy)Function (biology)Set (abstract data type)Linear matrix inequalityMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix normComputer scienceMathematical optimizationEigenvalues and eigenvectorsNonlinear systemDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the filter design problem for linear continuous-time systems with parameter variations in system matrices. The parameter variations are assumed to belong to a polytope with finite and known vertices. The designed filter parameters and the constructed Lyapunov function are both dependent on the online measured variations. A new sufficient condition for the existence of parameter-dependent filters is established and it can guarantee that the filtering error dynamic system is asymptotically stable and can satisfy the prescribed ℋ∞ norm bound. Then, the design of the filter is proposed by solving a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Simulation studies and comparison examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it