MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032648098 · doi:10.1017/s0022377803002575

Multi-dimensional transient process for a pulse ablating capillary discharge: modeling and experiment

2004· article· en· W2032648098 on OpenAlexafffund
Baoming Li, Daniel Y. Kwok

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plasma Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlasmaCapillary actionMechanicsPhysicsAtomic physicsElectrodeTurbulenceMaterials scienceThermodynamicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, ablative plasma generated by capillary discharge attracted considerable attention because of its possible applications in electrothermal launchers, laser-driven particle accelerators, thin-film deposition and soft X-ray lasers, etc. An electrical discharge through a capillary insulator heats the capillary plasma that provides further evaporation of the capillary wall and electrode. The created plasma is confined by the capillary wall, electrode material and flow in a specified chamber through a hollow electrode. The mass flux leaving the capillary in axial motion is replenished by a radial inward flow of matter. Thus the radial component of the mass flux plays a principal role in the mass and energy balance. In this paper, we present a theoretical model for a time-dependent magneto-hydrodynamical simulation to calculate the dynamic evolution of plasma flow and transportation in two-dimensional configurations combined with turbulent effect. The thermodynamic and transport properties are characterized by a model that describes the plasma composition, equation of state, internal energy, viscosity and thermal and electrical conductivity for a partially ionized multi-component plasma in the weakly non-ideal region, similar to that which exists in the ablation-controlled arcs. Our model results show that some of the well-known experimental features of this kind of discharge are confirmed, particularly the radial mass and energy transportation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plasma PhysicsSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207