MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032711348 · doi:10.1155/2010/415315

<i>X</i>‐Parameter Measurement of Pulse‐Compression Nonlinear Transmission Lines

2009· article· en· W2032711348 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Li, Rony E. Amaya, Robert G. Harrison, N. G. Tarr

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemWaveformPulse compressionTime domainElectronic engineeringFrequency domainSIGNAL (programming language)Network analyzer (electrical)Transmission (telecommunications)MicrowaveCompression (physics)Computer sciencePulse (music)AcousticsMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X‐parameters provide a powerful and eminently practical solution for interoperable measurement, modeling, and simulation of nonlinear microwave and RF components. Using X‐parameters to do large‐signal measurements has been brought into the spotlight. This paper introduces a new X‐parameter application: measuring large‐signal behaviour of pulse‐compression nonlinear transmission lines (NLTLs). A specially configured Nonlinear Vector Network Analyzer (NVNA) was used to measure the X‐parameters in the frequency‐domain, and then the measured data was transformed into a nonlinear time‐domain waveform. The results show both rise‐time and fall‐time reduction (double‐edge compression) as expected and indicate that this newly developed X‐parameter method implemented with an NVNA could correctly predict NLTLs′ pulse‐compression performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207