Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le phénomène de l’itinérance signale la nécessité de repenser nos notions et nos façons de voir et de faire autour de la question de la citoyenneté. Une société qui se préoccupe de l’inclusion et de la participation de ses citoyens dans le développement des communautés et des institutions devrait investir dans deux vecteurs fondamentaux. Le premier a trait à l’apprentissage de l’exercice de la citoyenneté et le deuxième, à la nature des organisations et des institutions sociales où peut s’exercer, dès la première enfance et jusqu’à l’âge adulte, la citoyenneté. D’une part, les apprentissages, d’autre part, les contextes. La contribution de la famille et de l’école peut représenter un atout majeur dans la prévention de l’itinérance si on débarrasse nos politiques sociales, aussi bien celles qui touchent la petite enfance que celles qui affectent les enfants et les adolescents, du double langage de la compassion verbale et de l’exclusion économique et sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".