Designing a new antifungal glycoconjugate vaccine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial capsular polysaccharides have been used as effective vaccines for adults but infants and seniors respond poorly to these immunogens because pure polysaccharides are unable to activate T-cells resulting in antibodies of low affinity and poor immunological memory. These deficiencies are addressed by conjugate vaccines composed of bacterial polysaccharide covalently attached to protein carriers such as tetanus or diphtheria toxoids. These vaccines activate T-cells and have been hugely effective in reducing the incidence of dangerous infectious diseases such as bacterial meningitis in infants and adults. The methods of conjugation often produce conjugate vaccines that contain polysaccharides with several cross links to one or more protein carrier molecules. Synthesis of large oligosaccharides derivatized to achieve single site attachment to protein has established the minimal size of an oligosaccharide that is required to produce protective antibody. Several examples are described where such oligosaccharides range in size from 8 to 16 monosaccharides. A more limited set of examples show that protective antibodies may be elicited by conjugate vaccines composed of tri and tetrasaccharide epitopes. One example is the β-mannan present in the phosphomannan glycoprotein of Candida albicans. Reverse engineering a protective antibody that recognizes this oligosaccharide revealed that a disaccharide was the minimal epitope. Further epitope mapping by functional group modification established that the internal mannose residue of a disaccharide was involved in the most important antibody-disaccharide interactions. NMR binding studies in combination with homology modeling of the bound β-mannan antigen suggested an optimum oligosaccharide for inclusion in a conjugate vaccine. Several conjugate vaccines were developed to test these conclusions. Immunization of mice or rabbits with conjugates containing disaccharide or trisaccharide conjugated to immunogenic proteins followed by live challenge experiments showed that the vaccines reduced fungal burden. The results of these and other studies suggest new approaches to novel synthetic conjugate vaccines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".