MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032741985 · doi:10.1159/000121023

Assessment of the Appropriateness of Services Provided by a Multidisciplinary Meningomyelocele Clinic

2008· article· en· W2032741985 on OpenAlex
Keith Chambers, D. Douglas Cochrane, Beverly Irwin, W. David Arnold, Paul Thiessen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpina bifidaMultidisciplinary approachFamily medicineFeelingPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1969, the Meningomyelocele Clinic at British Columbia's Children's Hospital has been serving the needs of children with spina bifida. In 1994, the clinic provided urgent and routine multidisciplinary clinical assessments to 330 patients and families. The purpose of this study was to assess, from the patients' and families' perspective, the appropriateness of the frequency of routine clinic visits and the value of the health services provided. Sixty-five patients/families were interviewed and completed a questionnaire developed by the clinic. Current visit frequency and services provided appear to meet the patient/family needs. The medical and nursing contributions were seen as valuable resources for the patient/families resulting in most patient/families feeling well informed about spina bifida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it