MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032773628 · doi:10.1115/icef2004-0932

The Effects of Intake Flow Swirl on the Combustion Characteristics of Hydrogen Fueled HCCI Engines

2004· article· en· W2032773628 on OpenAlexaff
Chengke Liu, Ghazi A. Karim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneous charge compression ignitionCombustionNOxAutoignition temperatureEnvironmental scienceHydrogenAutomotive engineeringFlow (mathematics)Nuclear engineeringIgnition timingMechanicsIgnition systemComputational fluid dynamicsMaterials scienceInternal combustion engineCombustion chamberThermodynamicsChemistryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the effects of the initial intake flow swirl on the combustion process of hydrogen-air homogeneous mixtures in HCCI engines. CFD KIVA3 code incorporated with detailed chemical kinetics was employed. The effects on the development and extent of non-uniformities in velocity, pressure, and temperature within the cylinder charge were investigated. Moreover, the effects of the initial flow swirl ratio values on the onset of autoignition and its timing, combustion duration, NOx emissions, and the onset of knock were evaluated. It is shown that an increase in the initial flow swirl ratio or speed lengthens the delay period for autoignition and extends the combustion period while reducing NOx emissions. There are optimum values of the initial swirl ratio and engine speed for a certain set of engine operating conditions that can achieve high thermal efficiencies and low NOx emissions while reducing the tendency to knock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207