The Moderating Effects of City Districts’ Retail Attractiveness on the in-Town versus out-of-Town Shopping Decision
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The retail sector plays a strategic part in urban regeneration. In this sense, municipal officials need to implement plans and encourage measures that will offset the relative loss of commercial appeal to out-of-town retail zones. To achieve this, it is important that they understand how shoppers choose between two possible locations. Using logistic regression functions, this work analyses to what extent a set of four judgemental indicators in a city’s different districts, forming its retail attractiveness, exerts a compensating effect by reducing the outcome of out-of-town shopping. Results confirm that retail attractiveness of districts, in interaction both with the entropy of shopping formats within the city, and with the size of the shopping basket, exerts an inhibiting effect to shopping acts in out-of-town retail areas. The study ends with recommendations for town centre managers, public authorities and private bodies towards reverting the reducing affluence of shopping acts in city centres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it