MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032786237 · doi:10.3138/ctr.157.010

Reconsidering Wealth: From a Treatise on Political Economy to a Transnational Artistic Project

2014· article· en· W2032786237 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Réjean Bédard, Catherine H. Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationCommonsPoliticsSpeculationGovernment (linguistics)Intellectual propertyCreative economySociologyPolitical scienceEconomyPolitical economyEconomicsCreativityLawFinancePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Réjean Bédard describes the working relationship between Québec’s Théatre Parminou and French theatre company La Tribouille that led to the creation of the Théâtre Parminou’s Trilogie de la Richesse. Working from a report on new measures of wealth prepared for the government of France by Patrick Viveret, each of the companies created their own set of three plays questioning how we measure wealth, how speculation has affected currencies, and how society might look different if we valued relationships more than material goods. The article also discusses the application of open-source or creative commons principles to theatrical creation, underlining the importance of making the intellectual property developed through the creative process freely available to other groups working on issues of alter-globalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.029
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207