MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032794826 · doi:10.5380/abpr.v31i0.603

As espécies de Violaceae Batsch nativas no Estado do Paraná, Brasil

2002· article· pt· W2032794826 on OpenAlexaff
MARDJA CÁSSIA MONTES LUZ, Olavo Guimarães, Dos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Biológica Paranaense · 2002
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViolaceaeHerbariumBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A família Violaceae Batsch pertence à subclasse Dillenideae, ordem Violales e no Brasil, a família está representada por aproximadamente 69 espécies subordinadas a 10 gêneros. O presente trabalho visa descrever as espécies ocorrentes no Estado do Paraná, indicando a área de ocorrência, apresentando chaves analíticas para identificação de gêneros e espécies, ilustrações, contribuindo para a flora deste Estado. A metodologia consiste no levantamento bibliográfico das descrições originais, coletas botânicas e análise morfológica de material depositado em diversos herbários nacionais. Foram confirmadas para o Estado do Paraná as seguintes espécies: Anchietea pyrifolia (Mart.) G. Don, Hybanthus atropurpureus (A. St.-Hil.) Taub., Hybanthus bigibbosus (A. St.- Hil.) Hassl., Hybanthus brevicaulis (Mart.) Baill., Hybanthus communis (A. St.-Hil.) Taub., Hybanthus parviflorus (Mutis ex. L.f.) Baill., Hybanthus velutinus Schulze-Menz, Noisettia orchidiflora (Rudge) Ging., Viola cerasifolia A. St.-Hil. e Viola gracillima A. St.-Hil. ABSTRACT The family Violaceae Batsch belongs to the subclass Dillenideae, order Violales, and in Brazil, the family is represented by about 69 species subordinated to 10 genera. This research was carried out based on botanical samples deposited in brazilian herbaria, concerning bibliographies and comparison with original descriptions of the species. This work includes descriptions of the all species found in the Brazilian State of Paraná, identification keys of genera and species, illustrations, geographic distribution maps and commentaries. From about 69 species and 10 genera of Violaceae presenty known in Brazil flora, 10 species and 5 genera are confirmed occurring in the Paraná State: Anchietea pyrifolia (Mart.)G.Don, Hybanthus atropurpureus (A. St.-Hil.)Taub., Hybanthus bigibbosus (A. St.-Hil.)Hassl., Hybanthus brevicaulis (Mart.)Baill., Hybanthus communis (A. St.-Hil.)Taub., Hybanthus parviflorus (mutis ex L.f.)Baill., Hybanthus velutinus Schulze-Menz, Noisettia orchidiflora (Rudge) Ging., Viola cerasifolia (A. St.-Hil.) and Viola gracillima (A. St.-Hil.). RÉSUMÉ La famille Violaceae Batsch que appartient à la sous-classe Dillenideae, ordre Violales, et au Brésil, la famille est représentée par approximativement 69 espèces ont subordonné à 10 genrens. Cette recherche a été exécutée a basé sur échantillons botaniques déposés dans herbiers du Brésil, à propos de bibliographies et comparaison avec descriptions originales de l'espèce. Ce travail inclut des descriptions du toutes les espèces ont trouvé dans l'État du Paraná, l'identification accorde de gerens et espèces, illustrations, cartes de la distribution géographiques et commentaires. D'approximativement 69 espèces et dix genres de Violaceae pour l'instant sus dans flore Brésil, dix espèces et cinq genres sont confirmés se produire dans l'État du Paraná: Anchietea pyrifolia (Marché. ) G. Don, Hybanthus atropurpureus (A. St.. -Hil.) Taub., Hybanthus bigibbosus (A. St..-Hil.) Hassl., Hybanthus brevicaulis (Marché.) Baill., Hybanthus communis (A. St..-Hil.) Taub., Hybanthus parviflorus (mutis ex L.f. ) Baill., Hybanthus velutinus Schulze-Menz, Noisettia orchidiflora (Rudge) Ging., Viola cerasifolia (A. St..-Hil.) et Viola gracillima (A. St..-Hil.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Biológica ParanaenseSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207