MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032798079 · doi:10.1002/pat.135

Poly(imidoaryl ether)s with bulky highly fluorescent pendent groups

2001· article· en· W2032798079 on OpenAlexaff
Yuezhong Meng, A.R. Hill, Allan S. Hay

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers for Advanced Technologies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtherChloroformPolymerMonomerFluorescenceGlass transitionAbsorption (acoustics)Polymer chemistryMaterials scienceAbsorption spectroscopyPhotochemistryChemistryOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three novel aromatic imidoaryl bisphenols 6a–c with bulky groups of varying size on the pendent phenyl ring have been synthesized from 3,8‐bis(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐­N‐phenyl‐1,2‐naphthalimide 1a. Poly(imidoaryl ether)s were synthesized in dipolar aprotic solvents by reacting the monomers with activated difluoro compounds. Glass transition temperatures (T g) for the polymers are in the range 265.9–315.0 °C, and they exhibit a range of colors from yellow to red. The highest T g and 5% weight loss temperature of these polymers were 315 and 496 °C, respectively. Most of the polymers are soluble in chloroform at room temperature. The UV‐vis absorption spectra of polymers 11ae, 11be and 16 were recorded in chloroform. Polymer 16 has the most intense absorption peaks (above 300 nm) at 492 and 528 nm, respectively, while the fluorescent spectrum of polymer 16 shows several peaks at 428, 539, 577 and 625 nm, respectively, when excited at 350 nm. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymers for Advanced TechnologiesSame topicSynthesis and properties of polymersFrench-language works237,207