MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032821009 · doi:10.1063/1.2181300

<i>In situ</i> measurements of simultaneous electronic behavior of Cu and Al induced by mechanical deformation

2006· article· en· W2032821009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)ElectronComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthWork functionCompression (physics)BendingTension (geology)CopperKelvin probe force microscopeCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyMetallurgyPhysicsAtomic force microscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of mechanical force acting on electrons inside a solid are of both fundamental and practical importance. This is especially emphasized by the recent applications of the Kelvin probing technique to investigate mechanical behavior of surfaces and interfaces. However, the effect of deformation on the electron work function (EWF) and its physical mechanism have not been well understood. In this study, simultaneous responses of the EWF of copper and aluminum to deformation during bending tests were measured in situ. It was demonstrated that in the elastic range, the tensile strain decreased the EWF, whereas compressive strain increased the EWF. However, in the plastic range, the EWF always decreased with strain for both tension and compression deformations. Considering changes in electrostatic energy of a one-dimensional lattice caused by dislocation density, we proposed a simple model and quantitatively established a correlation between the EWF and strain, which is consistent with the experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it