The VT+ and VT− Isoforms of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Type 1 Are Differentially Expressed in the Presumptive Mesoderm of Xenopus Embryos and Differ in Their Ability to Mediate Mesoderm Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we cloned a variant form of the type 1 fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR1), FGFR-VT-, from Xenopus embryos (Gillespie, L. L., Chen, G., and Paterno, G. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22758-22763). This isoform differed from the reported FGFR1 sequence (FGFR-VT+) by a 2-amino acid deletion, Val(423)-Thr(424), in the juxtamembrane region. This deletion arises from the use of an alternate 5' splice donor site, and the activity of the VT+ and VT- forms of the FGFR1 was regulated by phosphorylation at this site. We have now investigated the expression pattern and function of these two isoforms in mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cells within the marginal zone are induced to form mesoderm during blastula stages. RNase protection analysis of blastula stage embryos revealed that the VT+ isoform was expressed throughout the embryo but that the VT- isoform was expressed almost exclusively in the marginal zone. The ratio of VT+:VT- transcripts in the marginal zone indicated that the VT+ form was predominant throughout blastula stages except for a brief interval, coinciding with the start of zygotic transcription, when a dramatic increase in VT- expression levels was detected. This increase could be mimicked in part by treatment of animal cap explants with FGF-2. Overexpression of the VT+ isoform in Xenopus embryos resulted in development of tadpoles with severe reductions in trunk and tail structures, while embryos overexpressing the VT- isoform developed normally. A standard mesoderm induction assay revealed that a 10-fold higher concentration of FGF-2 was required to reach 50% induction in VT+-overexpressing animal cap explants compared with those overexpressing the VT- isoform. Furthermore, little or no expression of the panmesodermal marker Brachyury (Xbra) was detected in VT+-overexpressing embryos, while VT--overexpressing embryos showed normal staining. This demonstrates that VT+ overexpression had a negative effect on mesoderm formation in vivo. These data are consistent with a model in which mesoderm formation in vivo is regulated, at least in part, by the relative expression levels of the VT+ and VT- isoforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".