Characteristic performance of radio‐frequency (RF) plasma heating using inverter RF power supplies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High‐heat‐flux plasmas are produced by high‐power (∼14 kW) ICRF heating using inverter power supplies in the linear diverter simulator NAGDIS‐II. The power flow of radiated RF power is investigated by a calorimetric method. From conventional power calculation using antenna voltage and current, about 70% of the RF power is radiated into the plasma. But the increase of the plasma heat load along the magnetic field by RF heating is about 10% of the RF power. Through this experiment, we find that about half of the RF power is lost at the antenna surface through the formation of RF‐induced sheath, and about 30% of the power is lost into the wall of the vacuum vessel through the charge exchange and elastic collision of ions with neutrals. © 2002 Scripta Technica, Electr Eng Jpn, 138(4): 34–41, 2002; DOI 10.1002/eej.1136
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".