MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032828624 · doi:10.7202/704254ar

La gouvernance internationale de la biodiversité

2005· article· fr· W2032828624 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc Hufty

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La biodiversité est devenue un enjeu majeur des relations internationales. La nécessité d'assurer la sécurité alimentaire mondiale et le développement des biotechnologies ont transformé la diversité biologique en ressource économique. Mais les ressources nécessaires à son exploitation sont inégalement réparties. Les capitaux et l'industrie se trouvent au Nord, la matière première au Sud. L'industrie et les pays du Nord se trouvent dans une situation de dépendance stratégique. La solution consiste à mettre en place, dans le cadre de l'ordre économique mondial, un régime qui assure la conservation de cette ressource, permette son accès et offre des compensations aux pays du Sud. Ce régime a émergé dans une situation d'hégémonie et ses modalités reflètent la distribution asymétrique du pouvoir dans le champ de la biodiversité. Il tend aujourd'hui vers une situation de gouvernance, dans laquelle le pouvoir est plus diffus. Ces trois instruments théoriques, les champs sociaux, les régimes internationaux et la gouvernance, et leur articulation peuvent apporter une contribution à une économie politique internationale de la biodiversité, nécessaire d'un point de vue réaliste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207