La protéine prion ne se fait pas prier pour faire des agrégats moléculaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1013 M/S n° 12, vol. 22, decembre 2006 controle de la douleur. De plus, les hormones sexuelles ont tres probablement un role a jouer sur les mecanismes excitateurs et inhibiteurs de la douleur. La testosterone aurait un role protecteur, role qui serait d’ailleurs phylogenetiquement conserve, car la testosterone est hypoalgesique non seulement chez les mammiferes, mais egalement chez certains oiseaux [9]. Les hormones sexuelles femelles, pour leur part, auraient un effet modulateur sur les mecanismes inhibiteurs de la douleur. On peut donc croire que certaines pathologies qui s’accompagnent de douleur chronique sont reliees a des deficiences hormonales produisant des deficiences de mecanismes de freinage de la douleur. Nous pouvons donc imaginer que, dans un futur pas tres lointain, un medecin devra non seulement evaluer les mecanismes excitateurs de la douleur chez un patient atteint de douleur chronique mais egalement l’etat hormonal de la personne. Nous ne sommes peut-etre plus tres loin des analgesiques roses ou bleus ! ‡ Is pain sexist? Endogenous pain mechanisms and sex hormones
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".