The EXOR gate under uncertainty: A case study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Probabilistic AND/EXOR networks have been defined, in the past, as a class of Reed-Muller circuits, which operate on random signals. In contemporary logic network design, it is classified as behavioral notation of probabilistic logic gates and networks. In this paper, we introduce additional notations of probabilistic AND/EXOR networks: belief propagation, stochastic, decision diagram, neuromorphic models, and Markov random field model. Probabilistic logic networks, and, in particular, probabilistic AND/EXOR networks, known as turbo-decoders (used in cell phones and iPhone) are in demand in the coding theory. Another example is intelligent decision support in banking and security applications. We argue that there are two types of probabilistic networks: traditional logic networks assuming random signals, and belief propagation networks. We propose the taxonomy for this design, and provide the results of experimental study. In addition, we show that in forthcoming technologies, in particular, molecular electronics, probabilistic computing is the platform for developing the devices and systems for low-power low-precise data processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it