Capturing variability in pavement performance models from sufficient time-series predictors: a case study of the New Brunswick road network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes the use of multi-level Bayesian modeling for calibrating mechanistic model parameters from historical data while capturing reliability by estimating a desired confidence interval of the predictions. The model is capable of estimating the parameters from the observed data and expert criteria even in cases of missing data points. This approach allows rapid generation of several deterioration models without the need to partition the data into pavement families. It estimates posterior distributions for model coefficients and predicts values of the response for unobserved levels of the causal factors. A case study from the New Brunswick Department of Transportation is used to calibrate a simplified mechanistic pavement roughness progression model based on 6-year international roughness index (IRI) observations. The model incorporates the effects of pavement structural capacity in terms of deflection basin parameter (AREA) in place of the modified structural number, traffic loading (ESAL) and environmental factors. The results of the model showed that, as expected, chipseal roads have higher as built roughness and deteriorate faster than asphalt roads. Sensitivity analysis of the deterministic (the mean predictions) part of the model showed that in New Brunswick where traffic is relatively low the environment is the most important factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".